Profiling hearing-aid sound
Abstract
Assessment of audio quality has a strong tradition within concert hall acoustics, music reproduction and telecommunication, and some of the associated methods have recently been applied to hearing aid sound (Simonsen and Legarth, 2010). Many assessment methods have been developed and evaluated, and one of the most valuable methods is the use of assessment panels consisting of trained listeners (e.g., Legarth et al., 2012). Considerations about sound quality are an integral part of hearing-aid development as hearing-aid gain strategies and processing modify the sound by applying, e.g., frequency-dependent gain and dynamic-range com-pression, in order to compensate for consequences of hearing impairment. Hearing-aid manufacturers use different processing principles and different signal-processing technology to obtain this compensation. In the present study, the aim was to obtain the sound-attribute profile for Widex devices and compare this to profiles of devices from other manufacturers, as well as an earlier Widex device. The listening panel comprised listeners with hearing impairment and was provided by DELTA SenseLab. The sound preference of the listening panel was also measured in a variety of acoustic scenarios focusing on speech and music conditions. It was found that the sound profiles of the different manufacturer devices were different and that this may be explained by differences in processing principles and technology.References
Legarth, S., Simonsen, C.S., Dyrlund, O., Bramsløw, L., and Jespersen, C.T. (2012). “Establishing and qualifying a hearing impaired expert listener panel,” Poster at the International Hearing Aid Research Conference.
Simonsen, C.S., and Legarth, S.V. (2010). “A procedure for sound quality evaluation of hearing aids,” Hearing Review, 17, 32-37.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.