Fast and intuitive methods for characterizing hearing loss
Abstract
The possibility of integrating hearing-aid technology like dynamic compression in current and future consumer audio devices raises the question how parameters of hearing supportive algorithms can be adjusted by the user to either compensate the individual hearing loss or to accommodate listening preferences. Here, three methods for measuring the auditory capacity based on loudness judgments and comparisons were evaluated. All methods used a simple interface and appear generally suited for integration in consumer audio electronics. Results of the suggested methods were compared to adaptive categorical loudness scaling [ACALOS, Brand and Hohmann, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1597-1604 (2002)]. Gain prescriptions were derived for narrow-band loudness compensation based on the suggested methods, the clinically applicable ACALOS, and for NAL-NL2 [Keidser and Dillon, Hearing Care for Adults, 133-142 (2006)]. All loudness based procedures led to similar gains.
References
Brand, T., and Hohmann, V. (2002). “An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1597-1604
Ewert, S.D., and Grimm, G. (2011). “Model-based hearing aid gain prescription rule” ISAAR 2011
Hougaard, S., and Ruf, S. (2011). “EuroTrak I: A Consumer Survey About Hearing Aids in Germany, France, and the UK” in The Hearing Review
Keidser, G., and Dillon, H. (2006). “What’s New in Prescriptive Fittings Down Under?” in Hearing Care for Adults, pp. 133-142
Kreikemeier S., Latzel, M. and Kießling J. (2011). “Loudness-based Hearing Aid Fitting with Instantaneous Insitu-Percentile Monitoring” Z. Audiol. 50, 62-72
Latzel, M., Margolf-Hackl, S., Denkert, J., and Kießling, J. (2004). “Präskriptive Hörgeräteanpassung auf Basis von NAL-NL1 im Vergleich mit einem lautheitsbasierten Verfahren” DGA.
Lecluyse, W., and Meddis, R. (2009). “A simple single-interval adaptive procedure for estimating thresholds in normal and impaired listeners” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 2570-2579
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.