Benefits of common vocabulary in hearing aid fitting

Forfattere

  • Carsten Daugaard DELTA, Technical-Audiological Laboratory, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
  • Søren L. Jørgensen DELTA, Technical-Audiological Laboratory, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
  • Lone Elmelund Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55 DK 5230 Odense M

Resumé

No abstract available.

Referencer

Bech, S. and Zacharov, N. V. (2006). Perceptual Audio Evaluation, Wiley.

Daugaard, C., Jørgensen, S. L., Jørgensen, C. V., Legarth, S. V., and Zacharov, N.V. (2010). “Evaluating sound quality in hearing aids with reference test audiograms” in proceedings of ISAAR 2009: Binaural Processing and Spatial hearing 2nd International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research. Elsinore, Denmark. Edited by J.M. Buchholz, T. Dau, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, and T. Poulsen. ISBN 87-990013-2-2 (The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, Copenhagen), pp. 453-462.

Gabrielsson, A. and Sjögren, H. (1979). “Perceived sound quality of sound-reproduction systems” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1019-1033

Johannsen, K. and Prante, H. U. (2001). “Environmental Sounds for Psychoacoustic Testing” Acta acustica-ACUSTICA, 87, 290-293

Pedersen, T. H. and Zacharov, N.V. (2008). “How many Psycho-acoustic attributes are needed?” Proceedings of Euronoise, Paris.

Yderligere filer

Publiceret

2011-12-15

Citation/Eksport

Daugaard, C., Jørgensen, S. L., & Elmelund, L. (2011). Benefits of common vocabulary in hearing aid fitting. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 3, 432–440. Hentet fra https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2011-50

Nummer

Sektion

2011/4. Recent concepts in hearing-instrument processing and fitting