The role of envelope waveform in the processing of high- frequency interaural timing disparities
Resumé
Interaural timing disparities provide an important cue for lateralization in the human auditory system. The auditory system is sensitive to timing disparities in the ne-structure and the envelope of sounds. In the normal-hearing system, only envelope disparities can be exploited at high frequencies due to the lack of phase-locking to the ne-structure. Similarly, in cochlea implant users, interaural timing disparities of the envelope are of importance. It is, however, still unclear which speci c envelope waveform properties promote the most stable features for lateralization. In this study, psychophysical measurements were conducted with customized envelope waveforms in order to investigate the isolated effect of attack and decay times, as well as pause and hold durations in the envelope waveform on lateralization. For high-frequency tones centred at 4 kHz with systematic envelope modi cations, the just noticeable differences of ongoing interaural time differences in the envelope were measured. The results indicate that attack times and pause durations prior to the attack are the most important envelope features. The results are compared to predictions of binaural auditory models with different adaptation mechanisms prior to their binaural stage. Consequences of the different adaptation mechanism for monaural processing and for processing of cochlea-implant-like stimulation are discussed.
Referencer
Bernstein, L. R., and Trahiotis, C. (2002). “Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using transposed stimuli,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1026- 1036.
Bernstein, L. R., and Trahiotis, C. (2007). “Why do transposed stimuli enhance binaural processing?: Interaural envelope correlation vs envelope normalized fourth moment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, EL23.
Breebaart, J, van de Par, S., and Kohlrausch, A. (2001). “Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1074-1088.
Dau, T., Püschel, D., and Kohlrausch, A. (1996). “A quantitative model of the effective signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3615-3622.
Dietz, M., Ewert, S. D., Hohmann, V., and Kollmeier, B. (2008). “Coding of temporally uctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences,” Brain. Res. 1220, 234-245.
Dietz, M., Ewert, S. D., and Hohmann, V. (2009). “Lateralization of stimuli with independent ne-structure and envelope based temporal disparities,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 1622-1635.
Dreyer, A. A., and Delgutte, B. (2006). “Phase locking of auditory-nerve bers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: Implications for sound localization,” J. Neurophysiol 96, 2327-2341.
Dye, R. H. Jr, Niemiec, A. J., and Stellmack, M. A. (1994). “Discrimination of interaural envelope delays: The effect of randomizing component starting phase,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 463-470.
Ewert, S.D., and Dau, T. (2000). “Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope uctuations,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1181-1196.
Hartmann, W. M. (1987). “Temporal uctuations and the discrimination of spectrally dense signals by human listeners,” in Auditory Processing of Complex Sound, edited by Y. A. Yose, and C. S. Watson (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey).
Hartmann, W. M., and Pumplin, J. (1988). “Noise power uctuations and the masking of sine signals,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 2277-2289.
Henning, G. B. (1974). “Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 84-90.
Jepsen, M. L., Ewert, S.D., and Dau, T. (2008). “Modeling spectral and temporal masking in the human auditory system,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 422-438.
Joris, P.X., and Yin, T. C. (1995). “Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences,” J. Neurophysiol. 73, 1043-1062.
Klumpp, R.G., and Eady, H. R. (1956). “Some measurements of interaural time difference thresholds,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 859-860
Kohlrausch, A., Fassel, R., and Dau, T. (2000). “The in uence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 723-734.
Levitt, H. (1971). “Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467-477.
McFadden, D., and Pasanen, E. G. (1976). “Lateralization at high frequencies based on interaural time differences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59, 634-639.
Nuetzel, J. M., and Hafter, E. R. (1976). “Lateralization of complex waveforms: Effects of ne-structure, amplitude, and duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, 1339- 1346.
Nuetzel, J. M., and Hafter, E. R. (1981). “Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 1112-1118.
Patterson, R. D., Nimmo-Smith, I., Holdsworth, J., and Rice, P. (1987). “An ef cient auditory lterbank based on the gammatone function,” paper presented at a meeting of the IOC Speech Group on Auditory Modeling at RSRE, 14-15 December.
Püschel, D. (1988). Prinzipien der zeitlichen Analyse beim Hören (Principles of Temporal Processing in Hearing), Ph.D. thesis (University of Göttingen).
Stellmack, M. A., Viemeister, N. F., and Byrne, A. J. (2005). “Discrimination of interaural phase differences in the envelopes of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated 4-kHz tones as a function of modulation depth,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 346– 352.
van de Par, S., and Kohlrausch, A. (1997). “A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 1671–1680.
Siveke, I., Leibold, C., Kaiser, K., Grothe, B., and Wiegrebe, L. (2010). “Adaptation of interaural-time-difference analysis to sound level”, to appear in Advances in auditory research: physiology, psychophysics and models, edited by E. A. Lopez- Poveda, A. R. Palmer and R. Meddis (Springer, New York).
Yderligere filer
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
