Use of tinnitus masking functions to support or refute the presence or absence of auditory plasticity
Abstract
Tinnitus, the perception of sounds that do not have a peripheral correlate, is often hypothesized to be associated with cortical reorganization that over-emphasizes baseline cortical activity and is perceived as these phantom signals. But there are several issues that suggest this explanation may not be universal (if the system is plastic, why can't tinnitus be eliminated by another plastic change?). A potential technique to distinguish tinnitus that may be correlated with auditory plasticity versus tinnitus associated directly with peripheral damage will be evaluated. Narrow bands of noise will be used to determine masking thresholds across frequencies. Thresholds will be plotted relative to the tinnitus pitch to determine whether the frequency of optimal masking is aligned with the frequency of tinnitus, which does not support plasticity, or with adjacent frequencies, supporting the existence of auditory plasticity. Subjects with tinnitus frequency less than 6 kHz will be recruited, and a test battery will be collected, including DPOAE, tinnitus frequency, TEN test to detect possible dead zones, as well as masking thresholds with narrow bands of noise around the tinnitus frequency. Case studies will be presented to demonstrate the threshold functions found in a small sampling of tinnitus patients. Implications for treatment will be discussed.
References
Engineer, N.D., Møller. Å.R., and Kilgard, M.P. (2013). “Directing neural plasticity to understand and treat tinnitus,” Hear. Res., 295, 58-66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.