Benefits of common vocabulary in hearing aid fitting

Authors

  • Carsten Daugaard DELTA, Technical-Audiological Laboratory, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
  • Søren L. Jørgensen DELTA, Technical-Audiological Laboratory, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
  • Lone Elmelund Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55 DK 5230 Odense M

Abstract

No abstract available.

References

Bech, S. and Zacharov, N. V. (2006). Perceptual Audio Evaluation, Wiley.

Daugaard, C., Jørgensen, S. L., Jørgensen, C. V., Legarth, S. V., and Zacharov, N.V. (2010). “Evaluating sound quality in hearing aids with reference test audiograms” in proceedings of ISAAR 2009: Binaural Processing and Spatial hearing 2nd International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research. Elsinore, Denmark. Edited by J.M. Buchholz, T. Dau, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, and T. Poulsen. ISBN 87-990013-2-2 (The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, Copenhagen), pp. 453-462.

Gabrielsson, A. and Sjögren, H. (1979). “Perceived sound quality of sound-reproduction systems” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1019-1033

Johannsen, K. and Prante, H. U. (2001). “Environmental Sounds for Psychoacoustic Testing” Acta acustica-ACUSTICA, 87, 290-293

Pedersen, T. H. and Zacharov, N.V. (2008). “How many Psycho-acoustic attributes are needed?” Proceedings of Euronoise, Paris.

Additional Files

Published

2011-12-15

How to Cite

Daugaard, C., Jørgensen, S. L., & Elmelund, L. (2011). Benefits of common vocabulary in hearing aid fitting. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 3, 432–440. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2011-50

Issue

Section

2011/4. Recent concepts in hearing-instrument processing and fitting