Cognitive aspects of auditory plasticity across the lifespan

Authors

  • Mary Rudner Linneaus Centre HEAD, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • Thomas Lunner Linneaus Centre HEAD, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Eriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Snekkersten, Denmark

Abstract

This paper considers evidence of plasticity resulting from congenital and acquired hearing impairment as well as technical and language interventions. Speech communication is hindered by hearing loss. Individuals with normal hearing in childhood may experience hearing loss as they grow older and use technical and cognitive resources to maintain speech communication. The short- and medium-term effects of hearing-aid interventions seem to be mediated by individual cognitive abilities and may be specific to listening conditions including speech content, type of background noise, and type of hearing-aid signal processing. Furthermore, some aspects of cognitive function may decline with age and there is evidence that age-related hearing impairment is associated with poorer long-term memory. It is not yet clear whether improving audition through hearing-aid intervention can prevent cognitive decline. Profound deafness from an early age implicates a set of critical choices relating to possible restoration of the auditory signal through the use of prostheses including cochlear implants and hearing aids as well as to mode of communication, sign or speech. These choices have an influence on the organization of the developing brain. In particular, while the cortex may display sensory reorganization in response the linguistic modality of choice, cognitive organization seems to prevail.

References

Akeroyd, M.A. (2008). “Are individual differences in speech perception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing impaired adults,” Int. J. Audiol. Suppl., 47, S125-S143.

Andersson, U. (2002). “Deterioration of the phonological processing skills in adults with an acquired severe hearing loss,” Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol., 14, 335-352.

Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Baddeley, A. (2012). “Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies,” Ann. Rev. Psychol., 63, 1-29.

Baltes, P., and Lindenberger, U. (1997). “Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging?” Psychol. Aging, 12, 12-21.

Cardin, V., Orfanidou, E., Rönnberg, J., Capek, C.M., Rudner, M., and Woll, B. (2013). “Dissociating cognitive and sensory neural plasticity in human superior temporal cortex,” Nature Communications, 4, 1473.

Classon, E., Löfkvist, U., Rudner, M., and Rönnberg, J. (2013a). “Verbal fluency in adults with postlingually acquired hearing impairment,” Speech, Language and Hearing, Available online, DOI:10.1179/2050572813Y.0000000019.

Classon, E., Rudner, M., Johansson, M., and Rönnberg, J. (2013b). “Early ERP signature of hearing impairment in visual rhyme judgment,” Front. Auditory Cogn. Neurosci., 4, 241.

Classon, E., Rudner, M., and Rönnberg, J. (2013c). “Working memory compensates for hearing related phonological processing deficit,” J. Comm. Dis., 46, 17-29.

Cox, R.M., and Xu, J. (2010). “Short and long compression release times: speech understanding, real world preferences, and association with cognitive ability,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 21, 121-138.

Daneman, M., and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). “Individual differences in working memory and reading,” J Verb. Learn. Verb. Be., 19, 450-466.

Fine, I., Finney, E.M., Boynton, G.M., and Dobkins, K.R. (2005). “Comparing the effects of auditory deprivation and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex,” J. Cog. Neurosci., 17, 1621-1637.

Foo, C., Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J., and Lunner, T. (2007). ”Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 18, 553-566.

Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., and Elberling, C. (2003). “Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment,” Int. J. Audiol. 42, S77–S85.

Hagerman B., and Kinnefors C. (1995). “Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise,” Scand. Audiol., 24, 71-77.

Hällgren, M., Larsby, B., and Arlinger, S.A. (2006). “Swedish version of the hearing in noise test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition,” Int. J. Audiol., 45, 227-237.

Lin, F.R., Yaffe, K., Xia, J., Xue, Q.L., Harris, T.B., Purchase-Helzner, E., Satterfield, S., Ayonayon, H.N., Ferrucci, L., and Simonsick, E.M.. (2013). “Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults,” JAMA Intern. Med., 173, 293-299.

Lomber, S.G., Meredith, M.A., and Kral, A. (2010). “Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf,” Nat. Neurosci., 13, 1421-1427.

Luce, P.A., and Pisoni, D.B. (1998). “Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model,” Ear Hearing, 19, 1-36.

Lunner T. (2003). “Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use,” Int. J. Audiol., 42, S49-S58.

Lunner, T., and Sundewall-Thorén, E. (2007). “Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 18, 604-617.

Lunner, T., Rudner, M., and Rönnberg, J. (2009). “Cognition and hearing aids,” Scand. J. Psychol., 50, 395-403.

MacSweeney, M., Goswami, U. and Neville, H. (2013). “The neurobiology of rhyme judgment by deaf and hearing adults: An ERP study,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 25, 1037-1048.

Mattys, S.L., Davis, M.H., Bradlow, A.R., and Scott, S.K. (2012). “Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review,” Lang. Cogn. Proc., 27, 953-978.

Miller, G.A. (1956). “The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information,” Psychol. Rev., 63, 81-93.

Mishra, S., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., and Rönnberg, J. (2010). “Speech understanding and cognitive spare capacity,” in Binaural processing and spatial hearing. Edited by J.M. Buchholz, T. Dau, J.C. Dalsgaard and T. Poulsen (ISAAR: Elsinore, Denmark), pp. 305-313.

Mishra, S., Lunner, T., Stenfelt, S., Rönnberg, J., and Rudner, M. (2013a). “Visual information can hinder working memory processing of speech,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 56, 1120-1132.

Mishra, S., Lunner, T., Stenfelt, S., Rönnberg, J., and Rudner, M. (2013b). “Executive processing at high speech intelligibility levels in adults with hearing loss: A measure of cognitive spare capacity,” under review.

Ng, E.H.N., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Syskind Pedersen, M., and Rönnberg, J. (2013a). “Improved cognitive processing of speech for hearing aid users with noise reduction,” Int. J. Audiol., 52, 433-441.

Ng, E.H.N., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., and Rönnberg, J. (2013b). “Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech,” under review.

Nilsson, L.-G., Bäckman, L., Erngrund, K., Nyberg, L., Adolfsson, R., Bucht, G., Karlsson, S., Widing, M., and Winblad, B. (1997). “The Betula prospective cohort study: Memory, health, and aging,” Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn., 4, 1-32.

Nyberg, L., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K. Lindenberger, U, and Bäckman, L. (2012). “Memory aging and brain maintenance;” Trends Cogn. Sci., 16, 292-305.

Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., and Cappell, K.A. “Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis,” Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci., 17, 177-182.

Rodd, J.M., Davis, M.H., and Johnsrude, I.S. (2005). “The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity,” Cer. Cor., 15, 1261-1269.

Rönnberg, J., Arlinger, S., Lyxell, B., and Kinnefors, C. (1989). “Visual evoked potentials: relation to adult speechreading and cognitive function,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 32, 725-735.

Rönnberg, J., Danielsson, H., Rudner, M., Arlinger, S., Sternäng, O., Wahlin, Å., and Nilsson, L-G. (2011). “Hearing loss is negatively related to episodic and semantic long-term memory but not to short-term memory,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 54, 705-726.

Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A.A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlström, Ö., Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S., Pichora-Fuller, M.K., and Rudner, M. (2013). ”The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances,” Front. Systems Neurosci., 7, 31.

Rudner, M., Foo, C., Sundewall Thorén, E., Lunner, T., and Rönnberg, J. (2008). “Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing aid users,” Int. J. Audiol., 47, S163-S170.

Rudner, M., and Rönnberg, J. (2008). “The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing,” Cogn. Proc., 9, 19-28.

Rudner, M., Foo, C., Rönnberg, J., and Lunner, T. (2009). “Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids,” Scand. J. Psychol., 50, 405-418.

Rudner, M., Rönnberg. J., and Lunner, T. (2011). ”Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 22, 156-167.

Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Behrens, T., Sundewall Thorén, E., and Rönnberg, J. (2012). “Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise;” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 23, 577-589.

Rudner, M., Karlsson, T., Gunnarsson, J., and Rönnberg, J. (2013a). “Levels of processing and language modality specificity in working memory,” Neuropsychologia, 51, 656-666.

Rudner, M., and Lunner, T. (2013). “Cognitive spare capacity as a window on hearing aid benefit,” Seminars in Hearing, 34, 298-307.

Rudner, M., Mishra, S. Stenfelt, S., Lunner, T., and Rönnberg, J. (2013b). “Age-related individual differences in working memory capacity and executive ability influence cognitive spare capacity,” Aging and Speech Communication, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, October 6-9 2013.

Sarampalis, A., Kalluri, S, Edwards, B., and Hafter, E. (2009). “Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 52, 1230-1240.

Schneider, B.A., Daneman, M., and Pichora-Fuller, M.K. (2002). “Listening in aging adults: from discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics,” Can. J. Exp. Psychol., 56, 139-152.

Smeds, K., Wolters, F., and Rung, M. (2012). “Estimation of realistic signal-to-noise ratios,” International Hearing Aid Research Conference 2012 (IHCON), Lake Tahoe, California, August 8-12, 2012.

Unsworth, N., and Engle, R.W. (2007). “On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities,” Psychol. Bull., 133, 1038-1066.

Wang, D., Kjems, U., Pedersen, M.S., Boldt, J.B., and Lunner, T. (2009). “Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125, 2336-2347.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-15

How to Cite

Rudner, M., & Lunner, T. (2013). Cognitive aspects of auditory plasticity across the lifespan. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 4, 201–211. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2013-21

Issue

Section

2013/4. Hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids and cochlear implants