How to compare hearing-aid processing of real speech and a speech-modified stimulus for objective validation of hearing-aid fittings?


  • Søren Laugesen Interacoustics Research Unit, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark


Hearing aid, Auditory steady-state response, Coupler gain, Noise reduction


A method is proposed to evaluate whether a modern hearing aid with all automatic features enabled processes a speech-modified stimulus for objective validation of hearing-aid fittings as speech. The proposed method measures short-term coupler gains from brief snippets of steady-state probe noise, crossfaded into either the International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) or the speech-modified stimulus, which thus act as conditioning signals. For reference, the method is also applied to a steady-steady noise signal, which drives the hearing aids into noise mode. Results for a selection of hearing aids show that the method classifies the hearing aids’ mode of processing according to expectations, with all three conditioning signals.


Bentler, R. and Chiou, L.-K. (2006). “Digital noise reduction: an overview,” Trends Amplif., 10, 67–82.
Bisgaard, N., Vlaming, M. S. M. G., and Dahlquist, M. (2010). “Standard audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 measurement procedure,” Trends Amplif., 14, 113–120.
Elberling, C. and Don, M. (2010). “A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 128, 2955-2964.
Holube, I., Fredelake, S., Vlaming, M., and Kollmeier, B. (2010). “Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS),” Int. J. Aud., 49, 891– 903.
IEC 60118-15. (2012). “Electroacoustics – Hearing aids – Part 15: Methods for characterising signal processing in hearing aids with a speech-like signal,” IEC International Standard.
IEC 61669. (2015). “Electroacoustics – Measurement of real-ear acoustical performance characteristics of hearing aids,” IEC International Standard.
Laugesen, S., Rieck, J. E., Elberling, C., Dau, T., and Harte, J. M. (2018). “On the cost of introducing speech-like properties to a stimulus for auditory steady-state response measurements,” Trends Hear., 22, 1-11.
Naylor, G. and Johannesson, R. B. (2009). “Long-term signal-to-noise ratio at the input and output of amplitude-compression systems,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 20, 161–171.
Zaar, J., Simonsen, L. B., Behrens, T., Dau, T., and Laugesen, S. (2020). “Investigating the relationship between spectro-temporal modulation detection, aided speech perception, and directional noise reduction preference in hearing- impaired listeners,” Proc. ISAAR, 7, 181-188.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Laugesen, S. (2020). How to compare hearing-aid processing of real speech and a speech-modified stimulus for objective validation of hearing-aid fittings?. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 7, 317–324. Retrieved from



2019/4. Novel directions in hearing-instrument technology