Robust auditory profiling: Improved data-driven method and profile definitions for better hearing rehabilitation

  • Raul H Sanchez-Lopez Hearing Systems Section, Dept. of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5239-2339
  • Michal Fereczkowski Hearing Systems Section, Dept. of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Tobias Neher Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-9274
  • Sébastien Santurette Hearing Systems Section, Dept. of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Oticon A/S, Smørum, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-5734
  • Torsten Dau Hearing Systems Section, Dept. of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Keywords: hearing loss, data-driven profiling, hearing rehabilitation, hearing deficits, supra-threshold distortion

Abstract

Currently, the clinical characterization of hearing deficits for hearing-aid fitting is based on the pure-tone audiogram only. This relies on the assumption that the audiogram can predict performance in complex, supra-threshold tasks. Sanchez-Lopez et al. (2018) hypothesized that the hearing deficits of a given listener, both at threshold and supra-threshold levels, result from two independent types of auditory distortions. The authors performed a data-driven analysis of two large datasets with results from several tests, which led to the identification of four auditory profiles. However, the definition of the two types of distortion was challenged by differences between the two datasets in terms of the tests and listeners considered. In the Better hEAring Rehabilitation (BEAR) project, a new dataset was generated with the aim of overcoming these limitations. A heterogeneous group of listeners was tested using measures of speech intelligibility, loudness perception, binaural processing abilities and spectro-temporal resolution. As a consequence, the auditory profiles of Sanchez-Lopez et al. (2018) were refined. The updated auditory profiles, together with the investigation of optimal hearing-aid compensation strategies, are expected to form a solid basis for improved hearing-aid fitting.

References

Dubno, J. R., Eckert, M. A., Lee, F. S., Matthews, L. J., and Schmiedt, R. A. (2013). “Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models,” J. Assoc. Res. Oto., 14(5), 687-701. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013- 0396-x.

Johannesen, P. T., Pérez-González, P., Kalluri, S., Blanco, J. L., and Lopez-Poveda, E. A. (2016). “The influence of cochlear mechanical dysfunction, temporal process- ing deficits, and age on the intelligibility of audible speech in noise for hearing- impaired listeners,” Trends Hear., 20(0). doi: 10.1177/2331216516641055.

Lansbergen, S. and Dreschler, W. A. (2020). “Hearing aid feature profiles: the success of rehabilitation,” Proc. ISAAR, 7, 229-236.

Pauler, M., Schuknecht, H. F., and Thornton, A. R. (1986). “Correlative studies of cochlear neuronal loss with speech discrimination and pure-tone thresholds,” Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 243(3), 200-206. doi: 10.1007/bf00470622.

Plomp, R. (1978). “Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63(2), 533-549. doi: 10.1121/1.381753.

Sanchez-Lopez, R., Bianchi, F., Fereczkowski, M., Santurette, S., and Dau, T. (2018) “Data-Driven Approach for Auditory Profiling and Characterization of Individual Hearing Loss,” Trends Hear., 22. doi: 10.1177/2331216518807400.

Sanchez-Lopez, R., Nielsen, S. G. ,..., and Santurette, S. (2019). “Data for: “Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits: The BEAR test battery”,” (Version v1.0). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3459580.

Thorup, N., Santurette, S., Jørgensen, S., Kjærbøl, E., Dau, T., and Friis, M. (2016). “Auditory profiling and hearing-aid satisfaction in hearing-aid candidates,” Dan. Med. J., 63(10), A5275.

Wu, M., Sanchez-Lopez, R., ..., and Neher, T. (2020). “Perceptual evaluation of six hearing-aid processing strategies from the perspective of auditory profiling: Insights from the BEAR project,” Proc. ISAAR, 7, 265-272.

Published
2020-05-13
How to Cite
Sanchez-Lopez, R., Fereczkowski, M., Neher, T., Santurette, S., & Dau, T. (2020). Robust auditory profiling: Improved data-driven method and profile definitions for better hearing rehabilitation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 7, 281-288. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2019-32
Section
2019/4. Novel directions in hearing-instrument technology