Evaluation of a notched-noise test on a mobile phone
The ability to conduct hearing tests and estimate auditory function at home or in the workplace can be useful for screening or longitudinal studies and allow the collection of diagnostic data from tests that are too time consuming to be feasible in the clinic. However, moving away from an acoustically controlled environment may influence the results of a test (e.g., through masking due to higher levels of background noise), increasing the uncertainty in the test measurements. In this study, 9 normal-hearing participants completed a notched noise masking experiment with 3 different experimental setups: in a psychoacoustic test booth with a standard laboratory PC; in a psychoacoustic test booth with a mobile device; and in a quiet office room with a mobile device. The accuracy and reliability of the mobile implementation was compared to results obtained with the laboratory setup. The effect of the test environment was investigated by comparing the mobile platform results between booth and office. The mobile device implementation corresponded well with the laboratory results for a notch width of zero, but showed a systematic bias when the width of the notch was increased. The reliability of the mobile implementation was comparable to the laboratory. Moving outside the sound-insulated booth did not affect the mobile platform results.
Bland, J.M. and Altman, D. (1986). “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.” Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310.
Fereczkowski, M. (2015). Time-efficient behavioral estimates of cochlear compression. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark.
Moore, B. and Glasberg, B. (1990). “Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.” Hearing Res., 47, 103–138.
Patterson, R.D. (1976). “Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 59(3), 640–654. ISSN 0001-4966. doi:10.1121/1.380914.
Rosen, S. and Baker, R.J. (1994). “Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity.” Hearing Res., 73(7), 231–243.
Schlauch, R.S. and Rose, R.M. (1990). “Two-, three-, and four-interval forced-choice staircase procedures: Estimator bias and efficiency.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 88(2), 732–740. ISSN 0001-4966. doi:10.1121/1.399776.
Weber, D.L. (1977). “Growth of masking and the auditory filter.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62(2), 424–429. ISSN NA. doi:10.1121/1.381542.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.