Effects of noise and L2 on the timing of turn taking in conversation

  • Anna Josefine Munch Sørensen Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), DK- 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
  • Michal Fereczkowski Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), DK- 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7960-1188
  • Ewen N MacDonald Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), DK- 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6973-2926
Keywords: turn-taking, normal-hearing interlocutors, floor-transfer offset, articulation rate, speaking level, lombard speech, conversational interaction, conversational dynamics, conversational adaptation, noise, second language

Abstract

Previous studies of floor-transfer offsets (FTO), the offset from when one talker stops talking to the next one starts, suggest that normal conversation requires interlocutors to predict when each other will finish their turn. We hypothesized that increasing the difficulty of holding a conversation by adding noise and/or speaking in a second language (L2) would result in longer FTOs. Conversations from 20 pairs of normal-hearing (NH), native-Danish talkers were elicited using the Diapix task in four conditions consisting of combinations of language (Danish vs. English) and noise background (quiet vs. ICRA 7 noise presented at 70 dBA). Overall, participants took longer to complete the task in both noise and in L2 indicating that both factors reduced communication efficiency. In contrast to our predictions, in the presence of noise, the median of the FTO distribution decreased by approximately 40 ms and the standard deviation decreased by approximately 60 ms. However, the average median duration of utterances increased by 40% in noise. These findings are consistent with talkers holding their turn for longer, which may allow more time for their own speech planning. Overall, the results suggest that talkers may prioritise maintaining social norms for turn-taking fluency when communicating in difficult environments.

References

Baker, R., and Hazan, V. (2011). “DiapixUK: Task Materials for the Elicitation of Multiple Spontaneous Speech Dialogs,” Behav. Res. Methods, 43(3), 761–70. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0075-y

Beechey, T., Buchholz, J.M., and Keidser, G. (2018). “Measuring communication difficulty through effortful speech production during conversation,” Speech Commun., 100, 18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2018.04.007

de Jong, N. and Wempe, T. (2009). “Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically,”Behav. Res. Methods, 41, 385-90. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.385

Dreschler, W., Verschuure, H., Ludvigsen, C. and Westermann, S. (2001). “ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Instrument Assessment,” Int. J. Audiol., 40(3), 148–57. doi: 0.3109/00206090109073110

Gravano, A., and Hirschberg, J. (2011). “Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue”, Comput. Speech Lang., 25, 601–634. doi: 10.1016/j.csl.2010.10.003

Hadley, L. V., Brimijoin, W. O., and Whitmer, W. M. (2019). “Speech, movement, and gaze behaviours during dyadic conversation in noise,” Sci. Rep., 9, 10451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46416-0

Levinson, S. C., and Torreira, F.(2015). “Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language,” Front. Psychol. 6, 731. doi: 10.1038/s41598- 019-46416-0

Sørensen, A. J. M, Fereczkowski, M., and MacDonald, E. N. (2018). “Task dialog by native-Danish talkers in Danish and English in both quiet and noise,” Dataset. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1204951

Sørensen, A. J. M., Lunner, T., and MacDonald, E. N (2020). “Timing of turn taking between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired interlocutors,” Proc. ISAAR, 7, 37-44.

Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J.P., Yoon, K., Levinson, S.C. (2009). “Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2009, 106(26), 10587-10592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106

Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., and Bradlow, A. R. (2010). “The Wildcat Corpus of Native-and Foreign-accented English: Commu- nicative Efficiency across Conversational Dyads with Varying Language Align- ment Profiles,” Lang. Speech, 53(4), 510–540. doi: 10.1177/0023830910372495

Wheeldon, L. R., and Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). “Monitoring the time-course of phono- logical encoding,” J. Mem. Lang., 34, 311–334. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1014

Published
2020-04-22
How to Cite
Sørensen, A. J., Fereczkowski, M., & MacDonald, E. (2020). Effects of noise and L2 on the timing of turn taking in conversation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 7, 85-92. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2019-11
Section
2019/2. Learning from natural sounds