The effect of harmonic number and pitch salience on the ability to understand speech-on-speech based on differences in fundamental frequency
Differences in fundamental frequency (F0) between competing voices facilitate the ability to segregate a target voice from interferers, thereby enhancing speech intelligibility. Although lower-numbered harmonics produce greater pitch salience than higher-numbered harmonics, it remains unclear whether differences in harmonic ranks, and therefore pitch salience, affect the benefit of pitch differences. Earlier studies have not reported an effect of pitch salience, but have generally used only conditions where the difference in average F0 (ΔF0) between the two competing voices was large. It is possible that the effect of pitch salience is greater in more challenging conditions, in which the ΔF0 is relatively small. This study tested speech intelligibility in the presence of one speech masker for ΔF0s of 0, 2, and 4 semitones. The speech was presented in a broadband condition or was highpass or lowpass filtered to manipulate the pitch salience of the voicing. Results showed no interaction between filter type and ΔF0, suggesting little or no effect of harmonic rank or pitch salience in the ability to use F0 to segregate voices, even with smaller ΔF0s between competing voices. The results suggest some benefit of ΔF0 between competing voices, even in the absence of low-numbered spectrally resolved harmonics.
Bernstein, J.G.W., & Oxenham, A.J. (2003). "Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?" J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 113(6), 3323–3334. doi: 10.1121/1.1572146
Bernstein, J.G.W., & Oxenham, A.J. (2006). "The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Sensorineural hearing loss," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120(6), 3929–3945. doi: 10.1121/1.2372452
Bird, J., & Darwin, C.J. (1998). "Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences," Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing, 263–269.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 22.214.171.124).
Brokx, J.P.L., & Nooteboom, S.G. (1982). "Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices," J. Phon., 10, 23–36.
Graves, J.E., & Oxenham, A.J. (2019). "Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 145(4), 2072-2083.
Grimault, N., Micheyl, C., Carlyon, R. P., Arthaud, P., & Collet, L. (2000). "Influence of peripheral resolvability on the perceptual segregation of harmonic complex tones differing in fundamental frequency," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108(1), 263– 271. doi: 10.1121/1.429462
Hoekstra, A., & Ritsma, R.J. (1977). "Perceptive hearing loss and frequency selectivity," Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, 263–271.
Madsen, S.M.K., Dau, T., & Moore, B.C.J. (2018). "Effect of harmonic rank on sequential sound segregation," Hear. Res., 367, 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.002
Madsen, S.M.K., Marschall, M., Dau, T., & Oxenham, A.J. (2019). "Speech perception is similar for musicians and non-musicians across a wide range of conditions," Sci. Rep., 9(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46728-1
Madsen, S.M.K., Whiteford, K.L., & Oxenham, A.J. (2017). "Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds," Sci. Rep., 7, 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017- 12937-9
Nielsen, J.B., & Dau, T. (2009). "Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test," Int. J. Audiol., 48(10), 729–741. doi: 10.1080/14992020903019312
Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D., & Sullivan, J.A. (1994). "Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95, 1085–1099. doi: 10.1121/1.408469
Oxenham, A.J., & Simonson, A.M. (2009). "Masking release for low- and high-pass- filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125(1), 457–468. doi: 10.1121/1.3021299
Shackleton, T.M., & Carlyon, R.P. (1994). "The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95(6), 3529–3540. doi: 10.1121/1.409970
Sørensen, A.J., Fereczkowski, M., & MacDonald, E.N. (2018). "Task dialog by native-Danish talkers in Danish and English in both quiet and noise," Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1204951
Vliegen, J., & Oxenham, A.J. (1999). "Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105, 339–346. doi: 10.1121/1.424503
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.