An improved competing voices test for test of attention

  • Lars Bramsløw Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark
  • Marianna Vatti Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark
  • Rikke Rossing Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark
  • Niels Henrik Pontoppidan Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Denmark

Abstract

People with hearing impairment find competing voices scenarios to be challenging in terms of their ability to switch attention and adapt to the situation. With the Competing Voices Test (CVT), we can explore how they can adapt and change their attention between voices. The CVT provides three male and three female speakers, played in pairs. The task of the listener is to repeat the target sentence. Three methods of cueing the listener to the target sentence were tested: a male/female cue (for male-female sentence pairs), an audio voice cue and a text cue using one word from the target sentence. The cue was presented either before or after the sentence pair playback. The CVT was evaluated on 14 moderate-severely hearing impaired listeners with four spatial conditions: summed (diotic), separate (dichotic) plus two types of ideal masks for separating the two speakers from the sum. The results show that the test is sensitive to the spatial conditions, as intended. The text cue is the most sensitive to spatial condition. The text cue has the further advantage that it can be used for, e.g., male-male speaker pairs as well. Furthermore, the applied ideal masks show test scores very close to the ideal separate spatial condition.

References

Bramsløw, L., Vatti, M., Hietkamp, R., and Pontoppidan, N.H. (2014). “Design of a competing voices test,” International Hearing Aid Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA. Retrieved from http://www.eriksholm.com/about-us/news/IHCON_2014

Bramsløw, L., Vatti, M., Hietkamp, R.K., and Pontoppidan, N.H. (2015a). “Binaural speech recognition for normal-hearing and hearing- impaired listeners in a competing voice test,” Speech in Noise Workshop, Copenhagen, Retrieved from http://www.eriksholm.com/about-us/news/2015/SPIN_2015

Bramsløw, L., Vatti, M., Hietkamp, R., and Pontoppidan, N.H. (2015b). “Best application of head related transfer functions for competing voices speech recognition in hearing-impaired,” International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, Nyborg, Denmark.

Bramsløw, L., Simonsen, L.B., Hichou, M. El, Hashem, R., and Hietkamp, R.K. (2016a). “Learning effects as result of multiple exposures to Danish HINT,” International Hearing Aid Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA. Retrieved from http://www.eriksholm.com/about-us/news/IHCON_2016.aspx

Bramsløw, L., Vatti, M., Hietkamp, R.K., and Pontoppidan, N.H. (2016b). “A new competing voices test paradigm to test spatial effects and algorithms in hearing aids,” International Hearing Aid Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA. Retrieved from http://www.eriksholm.com/about-us/news/IHCON_2016.aspx

Helfer, K.S., Chevalier, J., and Freyman, R.L. (2010). “Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 128, 3625–3633. doi: 10.1121/1.3502462

Mackersie, C.L., Prida, T.L., and Stiles, D. (2001). “The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 44, 19-28. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/002)

Naithani, G., Barker, T., Parascandolo, G., Bramsløw, L., Pontoppidan, N.H., and Virtanen, T. (2017). “Low-latency sound source separation using convolutional recurrent deep neural networks,” IEEE Work. Appl. Signal Process. to Audio Acoust., New Paltz, NY.

Nielsen, J.B., and Dau, T. (2009). “Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test,” Int. J. Audiol., 48, 729-741. doi: 10.1080/14992020903019312

Nielsen, J.B., and Dau, T. (2011). “The Danish hearing in noise test,” Int. J. Audiol., 50, 202-208. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.524254

Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D., and Sullivan, J.A. (1994). “Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95, 1085-1099. doi: 10.1121/1.408469

Studebaker, G.A. (1985). “A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 28, 455. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2803.455
Published
2017-12-18
How to Cite
BRAMSLØW, Lars et al. An improved competing voices test for test of attention. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, [S.l.], v. 6, p. 279-286, dec. 2017. Available at: <https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2017-34>. Date accessed: 23 jan. 2018.
Section
2017/5. Speech perception: Behavioral measures and modelling