Lateralized speech perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners and its relationship to temporal processing
This study investigated the role of temporal fine structure (TFS) coding in spatially complex, lateralized listening tasks. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in young normal-hearing (NH) and two groups of elderly hearing-impaired (HI) listeners in the presence of speech-shaped noise and different interfering talker conditions. The HI subjects had either a mild or moderate hearing loss above 1.5 kHz and reduced audibility was compensated for individually in the speech tests. The target and masker streams were presented as coming from the same or from the opposite side of the head by introducing 0.7-ms interaural time differences (ITD) between the ears. To assess the robustness of TFS coding, frequency discrimination thresholds (FDTs) and interaural phase difference thresholds (IPDTs) were measured at 250 Hz. While SRTs of the NH subjects were clearly better than those of the HI listeners, group differences in binaural benefit due to spatial separation of the maskers from the target remained small. Neither the FDT nor the IPDT tasks showed a clear correlation pattern with the SRTs or with the amount of binaural benefit, respectively. The results suggest that, although HI listeners with normal hearing in the low-frequency range might have elevated SRTs, the binaural benefit they experience due to spatial separation of competing sources can remain similar to that of NH listeners.
Cooke, M., Barker, J., Cunningham, S., and Shao, X. (2006). “An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120, 2421-2424.
Hopkins, K. and Moore, B.C.J. (2010). “Development of a fast method for measuring sensitivity to temporal fine structure information at low frequencies,” Int. J. Audiol., 49, 940-946.
Hopkins, K. and Moore, B.C.J. (2011). “The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 334-349.
Moore, B.C.J., Stone, M.A., Füllgrabe, C., Glasberg, B.R., and Puria, S. (2008). “Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss,” Ear Hearing, 29, 907-922.
Nielsen, J., Dau, T., and Neher, T. (2014). “A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135, 407-420.
Neher, T., Jensen, N.S., and Kragelund, L. (2011). “Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners’ localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 1542-1558.
Papakonstantinou, A., Strelcyk, O., and Dau, T. (2011). “Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise,” Hear. Res., 280, 30-37.
Strelcyk, O. and Dau, T. (2009). “Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125, 3328-3345.
Studebaker, G.A., Scherbecoe, R.L., and McDaniel, D.M., and Gwaltney, C. (1999). “Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105, 2431-2444.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.