Perceptual space induced by cochlear implant all-polar stimulation mode
It has often been argued that a main limitation of the cochlear implant is the spread of current induced by each electrode, which activates an inappropriately large range of sensory neurons. In order to reduce this spread, a new stimulation mode, the all-polar mode, was tested with 5 participants. It was designed to activate all the electrodes simultaneously with appropriate current levels and polarities to recruit narrower regions of auditory nerves in the region of specific intra-cochlear electrode positions (denoted all-polar electrodes). In this study, the all-polar mode was compared to the current commercial stimulation mode: the monopolar mode. The participants were asked to judge the sound dissimilarity between pairs of 2-electrode stimuli that differed in the electrode positions and were presented in either monopolar or all-polar mode. The dissimilarity ratings were analysed using a multidimensional scaling technique and a three-dimensional stimulus perceptual space was produced. For both modes, the first perceptual dimension was highly correlated with the average position of the electrical stimulation and the second dimension moderately correlated with the distance between the two electrodes. The monopolar and all-polar stimuli were separated by a third dimension, which may indicate that all-polar stimuli have a perceptual quality that differs from monopolar stimuli.
Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Baskent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., et al. (2013). “Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients,” Audiol. Neurootol., 18, 36-47.
Borg, I. and Groenen, P.J.F. (1997). Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York.
Kong, Y.Y., Tansman, P., Marozeau, J., and Epstein, M. (2009). “Perceptual dimensions for musical timbre in cochlear-implant users,” Am. Audit. Soc. Annu. Meet.
Kong, Y.Y., Mullangi, A., and Marozeau, J. (2012). “Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. Ear Hearing, 33, 645-659.
Marozeau, J., de Cheveigné, A., McAdams, S., and Winsberg, S. (2003). “The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 114, 2946-2957.
Marozeau, J. and de Cheveigné, A. (2007). “The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121, 383-387.
Marozeau, J., McDermott, H.J., Swanson, B., and McKay, C.M. (2015). “Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., 16, 401-412.
McDermott, H.J., McKay, C.M., Vandali, A.E. (1992). “A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91, 3367-3371.
McKay, C.M., McDermott, H.J., and Clark, G.M. (1996). “The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99, 1079-1090.
Vandali, A.E., Whitford, L.A., Plant, K.L., and Clark, G.M. (2000). “Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system,” Ear Hearing, 21, 608-624.
van den Honert, C. and Kelsall, D.C. (2007). “Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121, 3703-3716.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.