Simulating hearing loss with a transmission-line model for the optimization of hearing aids
Modern hearing aids provide many parameters that can be adjusted to optimize the hearing experience of the individual user. Optimization of these parameters can be based on a comparison of an internal representation of sound processed by the hearing aid and the impaired hearing system with the representation in a non-impaired ear. Models that can represent the most common types of hearing loss and can be adjusted to fit individual hearing loss can play a crucial role in such optimization procedures. Simulations are presented that show the potential of a transmission line model in such a procedure. The model is extended to remap cochleogram energy based on estimations of the local instantaneous frequency. This ‘remapping’ of the cochleogram gives an advantage in tone-in-noise detection that may be related to neural deafferentation.
Biondi, E. (1978). “Auditory processing of speech and its implications with respect to prosthetic rehabilitation. The bioengineering viewpoint,” Audiology, 17, 43-50.
Duifhuis, H., Hoogstraten, H.W., van Netten, S.M., Diependaal, R.J., and Bialek, W. (1985). “Modelling the cochlear partition with coupled Van der Pol oscillators,” in Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms. Eds. J.B. Allen, J.L. Hall, A.E. Hubbard, S.T. Neely, and A. Tubis (Springer, New York), pp. 290-297.
Edwards, B., (2015). “Individualizing hearing aid fitting through novel diagnostics and self-fitting tools,” in Proceedings of ISAAR 2015: Individual hearing loss – Characterization, modelling, compensation strategies. 5th International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, Nyborg, Denmark. Eds. S. Santurette, T. Dau, J. C. Dalsgaard, L. Tranebjærg, and T. Andersen, The Danavox Jubilee Foundation.
Epp, B., Verhey, J.L., and Mauermann, M. (2010). “Modeling cochlear dynamics: Interrelation between cochlea mechanics and psychoacoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 128, 1870-1883.
Lopez-Poveda, E.A. (2005). “Spectral processing by the peripheral auditory system: facts and models.” Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 70, 7-48.
Mauermann, M., Uppenkamp, S., van Hengel, P.W.J., and Kollmeier, B. (1999). “Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of DPOAE fine structure in humans II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 3484-3491.
Moore, B.C., Huss, M., Vickers, D.A., Glasberg, B.R., and Alcántara, J.I. (2000). “A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea,” Br. J. Audiol., 34, 205-224.
Violanda, R.R., van de Vooren, H., van Elburg, R.A.J., and Andringa, T.C. (2009). “Signal component estimation in background noise,” Proc. NAG/DAGA 2009, 347, 1588-1591.
Zweig, G. (1991). “Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89, 1229-1254.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.