Evaluation of a clinical auditory profile in hearing-aid candidates

Authors

  • Nicoline Thorup Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Rigshospitalet
  • Sébastien Santurette Hearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-5734
  • Søren Jørgensen Hearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
  • Erik Kjærbøl Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Rigshospitalet
  • Torsten Dau Hearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
  • Morten Friis Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen

Abstract

Hearing-impaired (HI) listeners often complain about communicating in the presence of background noise, although audibility may be restored by a hearing-aid (HA). The audiogram typically forms the basis for HA fitting, such that people with similar audiograms are given the same prescription by default. However, this does not necessary lead to the same HA benefit. This study aimed at identifying clinically relevant tests that may be informative in addition to the audiogram and relate more directly to HA benefit. Twenty-nine HI listeners performed fast tests of loudness perception, spectral and temporal resolution, binaural hearing, speech intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating noise, and a working-memory test. Six weeks after HA fitting they answered the International Outcome Inventory – Hearing Aid evaluation. The HI group was homogeneous based on the audiogram, but only one test was correlated to pure-tone hearing thresholds. Moreover, HI listeners who took the least advantage from fluctuations in background noise in terms of speech intelligibility experienced greater HA benefit. Further analysis of whether specific outcomes are directly related to speech intelligibility in fluctuating noise could be relevant for concrete HA fitting applications.

Author Biography

Erik Kjærbøl, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Rigshospitalet

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Rigshospitalet

References

Bisgaard, N., Vlaming, M.S., and Dahlquist, M. (2010). “Standard audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 measurement procedure,” Trends Amplif., 14, 113-120.

Brannstrom, K.J., Lantz, J., Nielsen, L.H., and Olsen, S.O. (2014). “Prediction of IOI-HA scores using speech reception thresholds and speech discrimination scores in quiet,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 25, 154-163.

Festen, J.M. and Plomp, R. (1983). “Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 73, 652-662.

Füllgrabe, C., and Moore, B.C.J. (2014). “Effects of age and hearing loss on stream segregation based on interaural time differences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 136, EL185-191.

Glasberg, B.R. and Moore, B.C.J. (1989). “Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech,” Scand. Audiol. Suppl., 32, 1-25.

Hickson, L., Clutterbuck S., and Khan A. (2010). “Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA,” Int. J. Audiol., 49, 586-595.

Holube, I., Fredelake, S., Vlaming, M., and Kollmeier, B. (2010). “Development and a-nalysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS),” Int. J. Audiol., 49, 891-903.

Jespersen, C.T., Groth, M.B.J., and Hansen, T. (2006). “Danish reference data for the IOI,” Proc. 21st Danavox Symposium 2005, Hearing Aid Fitting, Eds. A.N. Rasmussen, T. Poulsen, T. Andersen, and C.B. Larsen. ISBN 87-982422-0-2 (The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, Copenhagen), pp. 475-491.

Jespersen, C.T., Bille, M., and Legarth, J.V. (2014). “Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA),” Int. J. Audiol., 53, 302-308.

Jørgensen, S.L. (2009). “Kvalitetssikring på offentlige høreklinikker – Resultater fra tilfredshedsundersøgelse for høreapparatbrugere,” DELTA Teknisk-Audiolog-isk Laboratorium, Odense, Denmark.

Larsby, B. and S. Arlinger (1998). “A method for evaluating temporal, spectral and combined temporal-spectral resolution of hearing,” Scand. Audiol. 27, 3-12.

Larsby, B. and S. Arlinger (1999). “Auditory temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 10, 198-210.

Léger, A.C., Moore, B.C.J., and Lorenzi, C. (2012). “Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss,” Hear. Res., 294, 95-103.

Lunner, T. (2003). “Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use,” Int. J. Audiol. 42, S49-S58.

Moore, B.C.J., Huss, M., Vickers, D.A., Glasberg, B.R., and Alcantara, J.I. (2000). “A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea,” Br. J. Audiol., 34, 205- 224.

Nielsen, J.B., and Dau, T. (2011). “The Danish hearing in noise test,” Int. J. Audiol., 50, 202-208.

Papakonstantinou, A., Strelcyk, O., and Dau, T. (2011). “Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise,” Hear. Res., 280, 30-37.

Ross, B., Tremblay, K.L., and Picton, T.W. (2007). “Physiological detection of interaural phase differences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121, 1017-1027.

Santurette, S. and Dau, T. (2012). “Relating binaural pitch perception to the individual listener's auditory profile,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 131, 2968-2986.

Strelcyk, O. and Dau, T. (2009). “Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125, 3328-3345.

van Esch, T.E., Kollmeier, B., Vormann, M., Lyzenga, J., Houtgast, T., Hallgren, M., Larsby, B., Athalye, S.P., Lutman, M.E., and Dreschler,
W.A. (2013). “Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study,” Int. J. Audiol., 52, 305-321.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-15

How to Cite

Thorup, N., Santurette, S., Jørgensen, S., Kjærbøl, E., Dau, T., & Friis, M. (2015). Evaluation of a clinical auditory profile in hearing-aid candidates. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 5, 67–74. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2015-08

Issue

Vol. 5 (2015): Individual Hearing Loss - Characterization, modelling, compensation strategies

Section

2015/1. Characterizing individual differences in hearing loss

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.