Characterizing individual hearing loss using narrow-band loudness compensation
Loudness is one of the key factors related to overall satisfaction with hearing aids. Individual loudness functions can reliably be measured using categorical loudness scaling (CLS) without any training. Nevertheless, the use of loudness measurement like CLS is by far less common than use of audiometric thresholds to fit hearing aids, although loudness complaints are one of the most mentioned reasons for revisiting the hearing aid dispenser. A possible reason is that loudness measurements are typically conducted with monaural narrow-band signals while binaural broad-band signals as speech or environmental sounds are typical in daily life. This study investigated individual uncomfortable loudness levels (UCL) with a focus on monaural and binaural broad-band signals, as being more realistic compared to monaural narrow-band signals. Nine normal-hearing listeners served as a reference in this experiment. Six hearing-impaired listeners with similar audiograms were aided with a simulated hearing aid, adjusted to compensate the narrow-band loudness perception back to normal. As desired, monaural narrow-band UCLs were restored to normal, however large individual deviations of more than 30 dB were found for the binaural broad-band signal. Results suggest that broad-band and binaural loudness measurements add key information about the individual hearing loss beyond the audiogram.
Bentler, R.A. and Pavlovic, C.V. (1989). “Comparison of discomfort levels obtained with pure tones and multitone complexes,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 86, 126-132.
Brand, T. and Hohmann, V. (2001). “Effect of hearing loss, centre frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling,” Int. J. Audiol., 40, 92-103.
Brand, T. and Hohmann, V. (2002). “An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 112, 1597-1604.
Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Ching, T., and Katsch, R. (2001). “The NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 12, 37-51.
Jenstad, L.M., Van Tasell, D.J., and Ewert, C. (2003). “Hearing aid troubleshooting based on patients’ descriptions,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 14, 347-360
Keidser, G., Dillon, H., Carter, L., and O’Brien, A. (2012). “NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments,” Trends Amplif., 16, 211-223.
Moore, B.C.J. and Glasberg, B.R. (1997). “A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss,” Audit. Neurosci., 3, 289-311.
Qiu, C., Salvi, R., Ding, D., and Burkard, R. (2000). “Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitudes in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain,” Hear. Res., 139, 153-171.
Schaette, R. and McAlpine, D. (2011). “Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physio-logical evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model,” J. Neurosci., 31, 13452-13457.
Smeds, K., Keidser, G., Zakis, J., Dillon, H., Leijon, A., Grant, F., Convery, E., and Brew, C. (2006). “Preferred overall loudness. I: Sound field presentation in the laboratory,” Int. J. Audiol., 45, 2-11.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.