Low-frequency versus high-frequency synchronisation in chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses

Authors

  • Filip Munch Rønne Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
  • Kristian Gøtsche-Rasmussen Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

Abstract

This study investigates the frequency specific contribution to the auditory brainstem response (ABR) of chirp stimuli. Frequency rising chirps were designed to compensate for the cochlear traveling wave delay, and lead to larger wave-V amplitudes than for click stimuli as more auditory nerve fibres fire synchronously. Traditional click stimuli were believed to only excite high-frequency fibres synchronously. It is still currently unclear whether the broad-band chirp stimulus leads to increased synchronisation of both low- and high-frequency fibres. It is also unclear if both these groups of fibres contribute significantly to the overall wave-V amplitude. In the present study, ABRs were recorded from 10 normal-hearing listeners using low- and high-frequency band-limited chirps and clicks (0.1 – 1.5 kHz and 1.5 - 10 kHz) presented at a level of 40 dB HL. The results showed significantly larger wave-V amplitudes for both low and high-frequency band-limited chirps than for the filtered clicks. This demonstrates that the synchronisation of nerve fibres occurs across the entire frequency range at this presentation level, and this leads to significant increases in wave-V amplitudes. The increase for the low-frequency chirp was found to be clearly larger than that obtained at the higher frequencies.

References

Dau, T., Wegner, O., Mellert, V., and Kollmeier, B. (2000). “Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar membrane dispersion” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1530–1540.

Dau, T. (2003) “The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses” J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 113, 936– 950

Elberling, C., Don, M., Cebulla, M. and Stürzebecher, E. (2007). “Auditory steady- state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay” J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 122, 2772–2785.

Elberling, C. and Don, M. (2008). “Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects” J. Acoust. Soc. Am 124, 3022–3037.

Elberling, C., Callø, J., and Don, M. (2010). "Evaluating auditory brainstem responses to different chirp stimuli at three levels of stimulation" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 215-223.

Greenwood, D. (1990). “A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 19 years later” J. Acoust. Soc. Am 87, 2592–2605.

Kiang, N. (1965). “Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve” Research monograph no. 35., The M.I.T. press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Neely, S. Norton, S., Gorga, M. and Jesteadt, W. (1988) “Latency of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli” J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 83, 652–656.

Richter, U. and Fedtke, T. (2005). “Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment using ’clicks’ as test signals” Int. J. Audiol. 44, 478–487.

Shore, S. E., and Nuttall, A. L. (1985). “High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1286–1295.

Additional Files

Published

2011-12-15

How to Cite

Rønne, F. M., & Gøtsche-Rasmussen, K. (2011). Low-frequency versus high-frequency synchronisation in chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 3, 275–282. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2011-32

Issue

Vol. 3 (2011): Speech Perception and Auditory Disorders

Section

2011/2. Neural representation of complex sounds and speech in the auditory brain

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.