Detection and identification of monaural and binaural pitch contours in dyslexic listeners

Authors

  • Sébastien Santurette Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-5734
  • Torsten Dau Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby
  • Hanne Poelmans ExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, K.U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven; Centre for Parenting, Child Welfare and Disabilities, K.U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven
  • Heleen Luts ExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, K.U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven; Centre for Parenting, Child Welfare and Disabilities, K.U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven
  • Jan Wouters ExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, K.U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven

Abstract

Binaural pitch stimuli were used in several recent studies to test for the presence of binaural auditory impairment in reading-disabled subjects. The outcome of three of these studies [Dougherty et al., NeuroReport, 9, 3001– 3005 (1998); Edwards et al., Dev. Neuropsychol. 25, 321-354 (2004); Chait et al., Brain Lang. 102, 80-90 (2007)] has been contradictory: Where the former two found that a majority of dyslexic subjects were unable to hear binaural pitch, the latter obtained a clear response of dyslexic listeners to Huggins’ pitch (HP) [Cramer and Huggins, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 413–417 (1958)]. The present study clari ed whether impaired binaural pitch perception is found in dyslexia. Results from a pitch contour identi cation test, performed in 31 dyslexic listeners and 31 matched controls, clearly showed that dyslexics perceived HP as well as the controls. Both groups also showed comparable results with a similar-sounding, monaurally-detectable, pitch-evoking stimulus. However, nine of the dyslexic subjects had dif culty identifying pitch contours, independent of the stimulus used. The ability of subjects to correctly identify pitch contours was found to be signi cantly correlated to measures of frequency discrimination. This correlation may be attributed to the similarity of the experimental tasks and probably re ects impaired cognitive mechanisms related to auditory memory or auditory attention rather than impaired low-level auditory processing per se.

References

Amitay, S., Ahissar, M., and Nelken, I. (2002). “Auditory Processing De cits in Reading Disabled Adults,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 302–320.

Banai, K., and Ahissar, M. (2004). “Poor Frequency Discrimination Probes Dyslexics with Particularly Impaired Working Memory,” Audiol. Neurootol. 9, 328–340.

Banai, K., and Ahissar, M. (2006). “Auditory Processing De cits in Dyslexia: Task or Stimulus Related?,” Cereb. Cortex 16, 1718–1728.

Chait, M., Eden, G., Poeppel, D., Simon, J.Z., Hill, D. F., and Flowers, D. L. (2007). “Delayed Detection of Tonal Targets in Background Noise in Dyslexia,” Brain Lang. 102, 80–90.

Cramer, E. M., and Huggins, W. H. (1958). “Creation of Pitch through Binaural Interaction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 413–417.

Dougherty, R. F., Cynader, M. S., Bjornson, B. H., Edgell, D., and Giaschi, D. E. (1998). “Dichotic Pitch: A New Stimulus Distinguishes Normal and Dyslexic Auditory Function,” NeuroReport 9, 3001–3005.

Edwards, V. T., Giaschi, D. E., Dougherty, R. F., Edgell, D., Bjornson, B. H., Lyons, C., and Douglas, R. M. (2004). “Psychophysical Indexes of Temporal Processing Abnormalities in Children with Developmental Dyslexia,” Dev. Neuropsychol. 25, 321–354.

Francart, T., van Wieringen, A., and Wouters, J. (2008). “APEX 3: A Multi-Purpose Test Platform for Auditory Psychophysical Experiments,” J. Neurosci. Meth. 172, 283–293.

France, S. J., Rosner, B. S., Hansen, P. C., Calvin, C., Talcott, J. B., Richardson, A. J., and Stein, J. F. (2002). “Auditory Frequency Discrimination in Adult Developmental Dyslexics,” Percept. Psychophys. 64, 169–179.

Hämäläinen, J. A., Leppänen, P. H. T., Guttorm, T. K., and Lyytinen, H. (2008). „Event-Related Potentials to Pitch and Rise Time Change in Children with Reading Disabilities and Typically Reading Children,” Clin. Neurophysiol. 119, 10 0 –115.

Hari, R., Sääskilahti, A., Helenius, P., and Uutela, K. (1999). “Non-Impaired Auditory Phase Locking in Dyslexic Adults,” NeuroReport 10, 2347–2348.

Hari, R., and Renvall, H. (2001). “Impaired Processing of Rapid Stimulus Sequences in Dyslexia,” Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 525–532.

Hill, N. I., Bailey, P. J., Grif ths, Y. M., and Snowling, M. J. (1999). “Frequency Acuity and Binaural Masking Release in Dyslexic Listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, L53–L58.

McAnally, K. I., and Stein, J. F. (1996). “Auditory Temporal Coding in Dyslexia,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 961–965.

Rosen, S. (2003). “Auditory Processing in Dyslexia and Speci c Language Impairment: Is There a De cit? What is its Nature? Does it Explain Anything?,” J. Phonetics 31, 509–527.

Santurette, S., and Dau, T. (2007). “Binaural Pitch Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing- Impaired Listeners,” Hear. Res. 223, 29–47.

Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M, and Escobar, M. D. (1990). “Prevalence of Reading Disability in Boys and Girls. Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study,” J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 264, 998–1002.

Wright, B. A., Bowen, R. W., Zecker, S. G. (2000). “Nonlinguistic Perceptual De cits Associated with Reading and Language Disorders,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 482–486.

Additional Files

Published

2009-12-15

How to Cite

Santurette, S., Dau, T., Poelmans, H., Luts, H., & Wouters, J. (2009). Detection and identification of monaural and binaural pitch contours in dyslexic listeners. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 2, 315–326. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2009-32

Issue

Section

2009/3. Speech processing and perception under adverse conditions