The precedence effect for speech and hearing impairment

Authors

  • Michael A. Akeroyd MRC Institute of Hearing Research (Scottish Section), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, United Kingdom
  • Fiona H. Guy MRC Institute of Hearing Research (Scottish Section), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, United Kingdom

Abstract

The “precedence effect” - the dominance of the onset when localizing sounds - is a fundamental part of spatial hearing. It enables a listener to make a decision on the direction of a source using only the rst-arriving (direct) sound while ignoring subsequent echoes and reverberation. Any dif culties with the precedence effect may thus be of practical importance as they will interfere with the perception of sounds in rooms. This may be especially true in complex, dynamically-changing backgrounds in which the direct sound and echo may be occasionally hidden. Here we report two experiments on the effectiveness of the precedence effect, measuring (1) localization dominance for speech targets (single words) in quiet and partially masked by diffuse speech babble, and (2) the effective onset duration needed to localize a sound. The results showed that, in general, the precedence effect worked less well for the more impaired listeners, but there was a fair amount of inter-individual differences.

References

Agus, T. (2008). Informational masking of speech for elderly listeners, PhD thesis (Department of Psychology, University of Strathclyde).

Akeroyd, M. A., and Bernstein, L. R. (2001). “The variation across time of sensitivity to interaural disparities: Behavioral measurements and quantitative analyses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2516-2526.

Akeroyd, M. A., Blaschke, J., and Gatehouse, S. (2007). “The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1077-1089

Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

Brimijoin, W. O., McShefferty, D., and Akeroyd, M. A. (2009). “Auditory and visual orienting responses in listeners with and without hearing-impairment,” manuscript submitted for publication.

Cranford, J. L., Andres, M. A., Piatz, K. K. and Reissig, K. L. (1993). “In uences of age and hearing loss on the precedence effect in sound localization,” J. Speech. Hear. Res. 36, 437-441.

Cranford, J. L., Boose, M., and Moore, C. A. (1990). “Tests of the precedence effect in sound localization reveal abnormalities in multiple sclerosis,” Ear Hear. 11, 282-288.

Dreschler, W. A., Verschuure, H., Ludvigsen, C., and Westermann, S. (2001). “ICRA noises: arti cial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology.” Audiology 40, 148-57.

Gatehouse, S., and Noble, W. (2004). “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ),” Int. J. Audiol. 43, 85-9.

Goverts, S. T., Houtgast, T., and Van Beek, H. H. M. (2002). “The precedence effect for lateralization for the mild sensory neural hearing impaired,” Hear Res 163, 82-92.

Hafter, E. R. and Dye, R. H. (1983). “Detection of interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 644-651.

Huang, Y., Huang, Q., Chen, X., Qu, T., Wu, X., and Li, L. (2008). “Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech re ection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults,” Hear. Res. 244, 51-65.

Lister, J. J., and Roberts, R. A. (2005). “Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli,” J. Speech. Hear. Res. 48, 482-493.

Litovsky, R. Y., Colburn, H. S., Yost, W. A., and Guzman, S. J. (1999). “The precedence effect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 1633-1654.

Roberts, R. A., Besing, J., and Koehnke, J. (2002). “Effects of hearing loss on echo thresholds,” Ear Hear. 23, 349-357.

Roberts, R. A., Koehnke, J., and Besing, J. (2003). “Effects of noise and reverberation on the precedence effect in listeners with normal hearing and impaired hearing,” Am. J. Audiol. 12, 96-105.

Saberi, K., and Antonio, J. V. (2003). “Precedence-effect thresholds for a population of untrained listeners as a function of stimulus intensity and interclick interval,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 420-429.

Saberi, K., Antonio, J. V., and Petrosyan, A. (2004). “A population study of the precedence effect,” Hear. Res. 191, 1-13.

Schneider, B. A., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., and Kowalchuk, D. (1994). “Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 980- 991.

Additional Files

Published

2009-12-15

How to Cite

Akeroyd, M. A., & Guy, F. H. (2009). The precedence effect for speech and hearing impairment. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 2, 263–274. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2009-27

Issue

Section

2009/3. Speech processing and perception under adverse conditions