Human localization and performance measures

Authors

  • Dorte Hammershøi Acoustics, Dept. of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark

Abstract

Localization is for some scenarios and situations vital for the success of hearing, e.g. when listening out single sources in multi-source environments, or when navigating primarily by audible information. It is therefore of interest to know the limits of the human localization capacity, and its dependence on e.g. direction and distance. When addressed in laboratory experiments, the signi cance of other modalities are controlled in different ways, yet gures will inherently re ect properties of the test situation as well. The present paper will discuss the methodologies of localization experiments, generally and by examples.

References

Arthur, J. C., Philbeck, J. W., Sargent, J., and Dopkins, S. (2008). “Misperception of exocentric directions in auditory space,” Acta Psychologica 129, 72-82.

Butler, R. A., and Humanski, R. A. (1992). “Localization of sound in the vertical plane with and without high-frequency spectral cues,” Perception and Psychophysics 51, 182-186.

Gardner, M. B. (1973). “Some monaural and binaural facets of median plane localization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1489-1495.

Gilkey, R. H., Good, M. D., Ericson, M. A., Brinkman, J., and Stewart, J. M. (1995). “A pointing technique for rapidly collecting localization responses in auditory research,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 27, 1-11.

Hammershøi, D., and Sandvad, J. (1994). “Binaural auralization. Simulating free eld conditions by headphones,” Proc. 96th Audio Eng. Soc. Conv. Amsterdam, Feb. 26 – Mar. 1, 1994, preprint 3863, 1-19. Abstract in J. Audio Eng. Soc. 42, 395.

Hofman, P. M., van Riswick, J. G. A., and van Opstal, J. (1998). “Relearning sound localization with new ears,” Nature Neuroscience 1, 417-421.
Old eld, S., and Parker, S. (1984). “Acuity of sound localisation: A topography of auditory space: I. Normal hearing conditions” Perception 13, 581-600.

Makous, J. C., and Middlebrooks, J. C. (1990). “Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2188-2200.

Møller, H., Sørensen, M. F., Jensen, C. B., and Hammershøi, D. (1996a). “Binaural technique: Do we need individual recordings ?” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 44, 451-469.

Møller, H., Jensen, C. B., Hammershøi, D., and Sørensen, M. F. (1996b). “Using a typical human subject for binaural recording,” Proc. 100th Audio Eng. Soc. Conv. Copenhagen, May 11-14, 1996, preprint 4157, 1-18. Abstract in J. Audio Eng. Soc. 44, 632.

Møller, H., Hammershøi, D., Jensen, C. B., and Sørensen, M. F. (1999). “Evaluation of arti cial heads in listening tests,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 47, 83-100.

Minnaar, P., Olesen, S. K., Christensen, F., and Møller, H. (2001). “Localization with binaural recordings from arti cial and human heads,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 49, 323- 336.

Perrett, S., and Noble, W. (1995). “Available response choices affect localization of sound,” Perception and Psychophysics 57, 150-158.

Wightman, F. L., and Kistler, D. J. (1989). “Headphone simulation of free- eld listening. II: Psychophysical validation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 868-878.

Wightman, F. L., and Kistler, D. J. (1992). “The dominant role of lowfrequency interaural time differences in sound localization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1648- 1661.

Additional Files

Published

2009-12-15

How to Cite

Hammershøi, D. (2009). Human localization and performance measures. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 2, 103–112. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2009-11

Issue

Section

2009/2. Perceptual measures and models of spatial hearing