Auditory brainstem responses elicited by embedded narrowband chirps

Authors

  • James M. Harte Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
  • Torsten Dau Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
  • Sylvain Favrot Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
  • Sarah Verhulst Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) have been investigated using rising frequency chirps to compensate for the dispersion along the cochlear partition in the auditory periphery. Responses elicited by the broadband chirp show larger wave-V amplitude than do click-evoked responses for most stimulation levels (Dau et al., 2000). It is desirable in some clinical (objective audibility assessment) and research (cochlear latency estimation, Neely et al., 1988) applications for more frequency specific responses. Traditionally, this has been accomplished using tone-burst stimuli, however these have the problem of spectral splatter associated with temporally short narrowband stimuli. Conceivably one could use narrowband chirps to synchronise a small number of auditory filters, and thereby gain frequency speci city. However, similar to the tone-burst ABRs, the stimulus duration would be very short, and therefore onset and offset effects will result in spectral splatter and thus degrade the frequency speci city. Junius and Dau (2005) showed that, by embedding a single broadband rising chirp, spectrally and temporally in two steady-state tones, the effects of spectral splatter along the cochlear partition can be minimised. Further, by ensuring that the excitation level is sufficiently low, one can keep any steady state responses in the evoked potential to a minimum. This paper presents a feasibility study in the use of embedded narrowband chirp stimuli to obtain frequency specific auditory brainstem responses, for use in clinical and research settings.

References

Allen, J. B. (1996). “Harvey Fletcher’s role in the creation of communication acoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1825-1839.

Dau, T., Wegner, V., and Kollmeier, B. (2000). “Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1530-1540.

de Boer, E. (1980). “Auditory physics. Physical principles in hearing theory I,” Phys. Rep. 62, 87-174.

Debruyne, F., and Forrez, G. (1982). “On-effect in brainstem electric response audiometry,” Otolaryngology 44, 36-42.

Gorga, M.P. and Thornton, A.R. (1989). “The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements,” Ear Hear., 10, 217-230.

Hecox, K., Squires, N., and Galambos, R. (1976). “Brainstem auditory evoked responses in man. I. Effect of stimulus rise-fall time and duration,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 53, 652-657.

Junius, D., and Dau, T. (2005). “Influence of cochlear travelling wave and neural adaptation on auditory brainstem responses,” Hear. Res. 205, 53-67.

Kodera, K., Yamane, H., and Suzuki, J. (1977). “The effect of onset, offset and rise- decay times of tone bursts on brainstem response,” Scand. Audiol. 6, 205-210.

Moore, B. C. J. (1986). “Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics,” Scand. Audiol. 25, 139-152.

Neely, S. T., Norton, S. J., Gorga, M. P., and Jesteadt, W. (1988). “Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 652-656.

Riedel, H., Granzow, M. and Kollmeier, B. (2001). “Single-sweep-based methods to improve the quality of auditory brainstem responses. Part II: Averaging methods,” Z. Audiol. 40, 62-85.

Shera, C., Guinan, Jr., J. J., and Oxenham, A. J. (2002). “Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioural measurements,” P.N.A.S. 99, 3318-3323.

Tsuji, J., and Liberman, M. C. (1997). “Intracellular labelling of auditory nerve fibres in guinea pig: Central and peripheral projections,” Jnl. of Comparative Neurol. 381, 188-202.

Úlehlová, L. Luboš, V., and Janisch, R. (1987). “Correlative study of sensory cell density and cochlear length in humans,” Hear. Res. 28, 149-151.

Van Campen, L. E., Hall, J. W., and Grantham, D. W. (1997). “Human offset auditory brainstem response: Effects of stimulus acoustic ringing and rise-fall time,” Hear. Res. 103, 35-46.

van der Drift, J. F. C., Brocaar, M. P., and van Zanten, G. A. (1988a). “Brainstem response audiometry. I. Its use in distinguishing between conductive and cochlear hearing loss,” Audiol. 27, 260-270.

van der Drift, J. F. C., Brocaar, M. P., and van Zanten, G. A. (1988b). “Brainstem response audiometry. II. Classi cation of hearing loss by discriminant analysis,” Audiol. 27, 271-278.

Wegner, O., and Dau, T. (2002). “frequency speci city of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1318-1329.

Additional Files

Published

2007-12-15

How to Cite

Harte, J. M., Dau, T., Favrot, S., & Verhulst, S. (2007). Auditory brainstem responses elicited by embedded narrowband chirps. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 1, 211–220. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2007-20

Issue

Section

2007/2. Physiological correlates of auditory functions