Modeling auditory signal processing in hearing-impaired listeners

Authors

  • Morten L. Jepsen Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
  • Torsten Dau Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

Abstract

Recently, an auditory signal processing model was developed which can sim- ulate psychoacoustic data from a large variety of conditions related to spectral and temporal masking in normal-hearing listeners (Jepsen et al., 2008). The model includes the dual-resonance non-linear (DRNL) filterbank suggested by Lopez-Poveda and Meddis (2001) to simulate the non-linear cochlear signal processing, and is otherwise similar to the modulation lterbank model by Dau et al. (1997). In the present study, the model parameters were modi ed to sim- ulate cochlear hearing impairment. The modi cations of the model were based on individual data from notched-noise masking and forward masking and were associated with changes of the parameters of the DRNL stage of the model. Data from a pure-tone audiogram were used to further reduce listener sensitivity in connection with an assumed loss of inner hair cells. In addition, intensity discrimination experiments and a modulation depth discrimination experiment were performed to estimate potential retro-cochlear (central) limitations of the processing of supra-threshold stimuli. The model helps understanding the perceptual consequences of hearing impairment in individual listeners and might be useful for the evaluation of hearing-aid signal processing.

References

Dau, T., Kollmeier, B., and Kohlrausch, A. (1997). “Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2892-2905

Ewert, S. D., and Dau, T. (2004). “External and internal limitations in amplitude modulation processing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 478-490.

Jepsen, M. L., Ewert, S. D., and Dau, T. (2007), “Modeling spectral and temporal masking in the human auditory system,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., accepted.

Kohlrausch, A., Fassel, R., and Dau, T. (2000). “The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 723-734.

Lopez-Poveda, E. A., and Meddis, R. (2001). “A human nonlinear cochlear lter- bank,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 3107–3118.

Muller M., Robertson D., and Yates G. K. (1991). “Rate-versus-level functions of primary auditory nerve fibres: evidence for square law behaviour of all fibre categories in the guinea pig,” Hear. Res. 55, 50–56.

Oxenham, A., and Plack, C. (1997). “A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane non- linearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3666-3675

Plack C. J., and Oxenham A. J. (2000). “Basilar-membrane nonlinearity estimated by pulsation threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 501–507.

Rosen, S., Baker, R. J., and Darling, A. (1998). “Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 2539-2550.

Rosengard, P.S., Oxenham, A.J., and Braida, L.D. (2005). “Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 3028-3041

Additional Files

Published

2007-12-15

How to Cite

Jepsen, M. L., & Dau, T. (2007). Modeling auditory signal processing in hearing-impaired listeners. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 1, 93–102. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2007-09

Issue

Section

2007/1. Auditory signal processing and perception