Perceptual learning and speech perception: A new hypothesis
Perceptual learning for speech remains substantial even in older adults, but the functional significance of this observation is not well understood. It has been suggested that perceptual learning might serve to support listening in adverse conditions by promoting behavioural and neural plasticity, but this hypothesis is not consistent with the acoustic specificity of learning. Instead, we now suggest that in the context of speech perception, perceptual learning might be best viewed as one of the capacities that, like working memory, support speech perception in an on-line fashion. Consistent with this hypothesis, we present data that rapid perceptual learning of one speech task accounts for substantial individual differences in other speech tasks even after accounting for the potential correlations between different indices of speech perception.
Adank, P. and Janse, E. (2009). “Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 126, 2649-2659. doi: 10.1121/1.3216914
Altmann, T. and Young, D. (1993). “Factors affecting adaptation to time-compressed speech,” EUROSPEECH '93. Berlin, 333-336.
Banai, K. and Lavner, Y. (2014). “The effects of training length on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its generalization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 136, 1908. doi: 10.1121/1.4895684
Burk, M. H. and Humes, L. E. (2008). “Effects of long-term training on aided speech- recognition performance in noise in older adults,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 51, 759-771. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/054)
Dupoux, E. and Green, K. (1997). “Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes,” J. Exp. Psychol. Human, 23, 914-927. doi: 10.1037/0096-15126.96.36.1994
Green, C. S., Banai, K., Lu, Z. and Bavelier, D. (2019). “Perceptual Learning,” Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. J. T. Wixted, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1-47. doi: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn217
Henshaw, H. and Ferguson, M. A. (2013). “Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence,” PLoS One 8, e62836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062836
Karawani, H., Bitan, T., Attias, J. and Banai, K. (2016). “Auditory perceptual learning in adults with and without age-related hearing loss,” Front Psychol., 6, 2066. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02066
Karawani, H., Lavie, L. and Banai, K. (2017). “Short-term auditory learning in older and younger adults,” Proc. ISAAR, 6, 1-8.
Lavie, L., Attias, J. and Karni, A. (2013). “Semi-structured listening experience (listening training) in hearing aid fitting: influence on dichotic listening,” Am. J. Audiol., 22, 347-350. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889
Manheim, M., Lavie, L. and Banai, K. (2018). “Age, Hearing, and the Perceptual Learning of Rapid Speech,” Trends Hear., 22, 2331216518778651. doi: 10.1177/2331216518778651
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R. and Scott, S. K. (2012). “Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review,” Lang. Cogn. Process., 27, 953-978. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.705006
Peelle, J. E. and Wingfield, A. (2005). “Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 31, 1315-1330. doi: 10.1037/0096- 15188.8.131.525
Pichora-Fuller, M. K. and Levitt, H. (2012). “Speech comprehension training and auditory and cognitive processing in older adults,” Am. J. Audiol., 21, 351-357. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889
Prior, A. and Bentin, S. (2006). “Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents,” Psychophysiology, 43, 440-449. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00426.x
Ronnberg, J., E. Holmer and Rudner, M. (2019). “Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding,” Int. J. Audiol., 58, 247-261. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1551631
Rotman, T., Lavie, L., and Banai, K. (2020). “Rapid perceptual learning of time- compressed speech and the perception of natural fast speech in older adults with presbycusis,” Proc. ISAAR, 7, 93-100.
Samuel, A. G. and Kraljic, T. (2009). “Perceptual learning for speech,” Atten. Percept. Psychophys., 71, 1207-1218. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1207
Saunders, G. H., Smith, S. L. , Chisolm, T. H. , Frederick, M. T. , McArdle, R. A. and Wilson, R. H. (2016). “A randomized control trial: Supplementing hearing aid use with listening and communication enhancement (LACE) auditory training,” Ear Hearing, 37, 381-396. doi: 0.1097/AUD.0000000000000283
Sweetow, R. W. and Sabes, J. H. (2006). “The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 17, 538-558. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17.8.2
Verhelst, W. and Roelands, M. (1993). “An overlap-add technique based on waveform similarity (WSOLA) for high quality time-scale modification of speech,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Minneapolis, MN, USA, 554-557.
Wright, B. A., Wilson, R. M. and Sabin, A. T. (2010). “Generalization lags behind learning on an auditory perceptual task,” J. Neurosci. 30, 11635-11639. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1441-10.2010
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.