Perceptual space induced by cochlear implant all-polar stimulation mode


  • Jeremy Marozeau Hearing Systems Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
  • Colette McKay Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Australia


It has often been argued that a main limitation of the cochlear implant is the spread of current induced by each electrode, which activates an inappropriately large range of sensory neurons. In order to reduce this spread, a new stimulation mode, the all-polar mode, was tested with 5 participants. It was designed to activate all the electrodes simultaneously with appropriate current levels and polarities to recruit narrower regions of auditory nerves in the region of specific intra-cochlear electrode positions (denoted all-polar electrodes). In this study, the all-polar mode was compared to the current commercial stimulation mode: the monopolar mode. The participants were asked to judge the sound dissimilarity between pairs of 2-electrode stimuli that differed in the electrode positions and were presented in either monopolar or all-polar mode. The dissimilarity ratings were analysed using a multidimensional scaling technique and a three-dimensional stimulus perceptual space was produced. For both modes, the first perceptual dimension was highly correlated with the average position of the electrical stimulation and the second dimension moderately correlated with the distance between the two electrodes. The monopolar and all-polar stimuli were separated by a third dimension, which may indicate that all-polar stimuli have a perceptual quality that differs from monopolar stimuli.


Blamey, P., Artieres, F., Baskent, D., Bergeron, F., Beynon, A., et al. (2013). “Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients,” Audiol. Neurootol., 18, 36-47.

Borg, I. and Groenen, P.J.F. (1997). Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York.

Kong, Y.Y., Tansman, P., Marozeau, J., and Epstein, M. (2009). “Perceptual dimensions for musical timbre in cochlear-implant users,” Am. Audit. Soc. Annu. Meet.

Kong, Y.Y., Mullangi, A., and Marozeau, J. (2012). “Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. Ear Hearing, 33, 645-659.

Marozeau, J., de Cheveigné, A., McAdams, S., and Winsberg, S. (2003). “The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 114, 2946-2957.

Marozeau, J. and de Cheveigné, A. (2007). “The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121, 383-387.

Marozeau, J., McDermott, H.J., Swanson, B., and McKay, C.M. (2015). “Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., 16, 401-412.

McDermott, H.J., McKay, C.M., Vandali, A.E. (1992). “A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91, 3367-3371.

McKay, C.M., McDermott, H.J., and Clark, G.M. (1996). “The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99, 1079-1090.

Vandali, A.E., Whitford, L.A., Plant, K.L., and Clark, G.M. (2000). “Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system,” Ear Hearing, 21, 608-624.

van den Honert, C. and Kelsall, D.C. (2007). “Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121, 3703-3716.




How to Cite

Marozeau, J., & McKay, C. (2015). Perceptual space induced by cochlear implant all-polar stimulation mode. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 5, 333–339. Retrieved from



2015/5. Compensation strategies for rehabilitation with cochlear implants