Promoting off-axis listening and preserving spatial cues with Binaural Directionality II

Authors

  • Tobias Piechowiak GN ReSound A/S, Ballerup, Denmark
  • Jesper Udesen GN ReSound A/S, Ballerup, Denmark
  • Kimi Moeller GN ReSound A/S, Ballerup, Denmark
  • Fredrik Gran GN ReSound A/S, Ballerup, Denmark
  • Andrew Dittberner GN ReSound North America, Glenview, IL, USA

Abstract

Hearing in complex acoustic scenes is a challenge for hearing-impaired persons that often persists after amplification is applied even when fitted bilaterally. From a hearing aid (HA) processing point of view there can be several reasons for this. First, directional filters in a symmetric fitting can help increase signal-to-noise ratio for on-axis signals-of-interest. However, they also can render off-axis signals inaudible. Second, HA microphone location can degrade spatial cues that are important for localization and thus listening in complex acoustic scenes. Third, amplification itself, when applied independently at both ears, can affect spatial cues, mainly interaural-level-differences. Finally, changing acoustic scenes might require changing processing. In order to overcome some of these challenges we propose a bilateral fitting scheme that can be symmetric or asymmetric depending on the acoustic scene. The respective HA processing modes can be (a) omnidirectional, (b) directional, or (c) directional with preservation of spatial cues. In this study it was shown that asymmetric fitting helps improve off-axis audibility when prioritized while it provides natural sound and decreases listening effort for symmetric fitting in situations when audibility is not the main focus.

References

Cord, M.T., Walden, R.K., Walden, B.E., and Dyrlund, O. (2004). “Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 15, 353-364.

Edmonds, B.A. and Culling, J.F. (2005). “The spatial unmasking of speech: Evidence for within-channel processing of interaural time delay,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117, 3069-3078.

Edmonds, B.A. and Culling, J.F. (2006). “The spatial unmasking of speech: Evidence for better-ear listening,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120, 1539-1545.

Gatehouse, S. and Noble, W. (2004). “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ),” Int. J. Audiol., 43, 85-99.

Hoffmann, H.W., Trine, T.D., Buckley, K.M., and van Tasell, D.J. (1994). “Robust adaptive microphone array processing for hearing aids: Realistic speech enhancement,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 96, 759-770.

Hornsby, B.W.Y. and Ricketts, T.A. (2007). “Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings,” Ear Hearing, 28, 177-186.

Keidser, G., Rohrseitz, K., Dillon, H., Hamacher, V., Carter, L., Rass, U., and Convery, E. (2006). “The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers,” Int. J. Audiol., 45, 563-579.

Kochkin, S. (2000). “Why my hearing aids are in the drawer: The consumer’s perspective.” Hear. J., 53, 34-42.

Nielsen, H.B. (1973). “A comparison between hearing aids with directional microphone and hearing aids with conventional microphone,” Scand. Audiol., 2, 173-176.

Van den Bogaert T., Klasen, J.K., Van Deun, L., and Wouters, J. (2006). “Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: Without is better than with,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119, 515-526.

Walden, B.E., Surr, R.K., Cord, M.T., Edwards, B.E., and Olson, L. (2000). “Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol., 11, 540-560.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-15

How to Cite

Piechowiak, T., Udesen, J., Moeller, K., Gran, F., & Dittberner, A. (2015). Promoting off-axis listening and preserving spatial cues with Binaural Directionality II. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 5, 285–292. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2015-33

Issue

Vol. 5 (2015): Individual Hearing Loss - Characterization, modelling, compensation strategies

Section

2015/4. Compensation strategies for hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright* and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

*From the 2017 issue onward. The Danavox Jubilee Foundation owns the copyright of all articles published in the 1969-2015 issues. However, authors are still allowed to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.