Temporal suppression of long-latency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions

Authors

  • Sarah Verhulst Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
  • James M. Harte Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
  • Torsten Dau Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Ørsted•DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark

Abstract

This paper investigates suppression of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) using the same paradigm as Hine and Thornton (2002) in which a suppressor-click was presented close in time to a test-click. The experiment was repeated and the analysis extended to long-latency CEOAEs (duration > 20 ms), whereas the previous study only focussed on the 'short-latency' CEOAE (duration < 20 ms). The hypothesis was that suppression would continue on the long-latency CEOAE since this region is probably dominated by spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs) synchronising with the click stimulus. The results for ve exemplary subjects showed that suppression remained on the long-latency CEOAE, indicating that both SOAEs and CEOAEs originate from the same cochlear nonlinearities, as suggested by Kemp and Chum (1980a). Further proof of suppression of long-latency SOAE components was sought in the spectral domain. A comparison of the magnitude of certain SOAE components in the suppressed and unsuppressed condition for a particular subject showed that suppression affected SOAE components in a similar way as the purely click-evoked OAE components.

References

Eguiluz, V. M., Ospeck, M., Choe, Y., Hudspeth, A. J., and Magnasco, M. O. (2000). “Essential nonlinearities in hearing,” Physical Review Letters, 84, 5232-5235.

Hine, J. E. and Thornton, A. R. D. (2002). “Temporal nonlinearity revealed by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded to trains of multiple clicks,” Hear. Res. 165, 128-141.

Kapadia, S., and Lutman, M. E. (2000). “Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data,” Hear, Res. 146, 101-120.

Kemp, D. T. (1978). “Stimulated acoustic emissions from within human auditory-system,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1386-1391.

Kemp, D. T., and Chum, R. (1980). “Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions,” Hear. Res., 2, 213-232.

Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., and Martin, G. K. (1991). “A review of otoacoustic emissions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2027-2067.

Tavartkiladze, G. A., Frolenkov, G. I., Kruglov, A. V., and Artamasov, S. V. (1994). “Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions,” British J. Audiol. 28, 193-204.

Verhulst, S. (2006). “The role of temporal synchrony for the generation of otoacoustic emissions,” Master Thesis, Ørsted-DTU, Technical University of Denmark.

Additional Files

Published

2007-12-15

How to Cite

Verhulst, S., Harte, J. M., & Dau, T. (2007). Temporal suppression of long-latency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, 1, 231–240. Retrieved from https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2007-22

Issue

Section

2007/2. Physiological correlates of auditory functions